Withose for operations leaders
Ops decisions are made in chat. Then they vanish.
Vendor selections, policy changes, process cutovers, exception approvals: operations makes more recorded-worthy decisions per week than any other function, and almost all of them happen in a chat thread that will be effectively gone in a month. The cost shows up later, as an audit question nobody can answer, a policy applied two different ways, or a vendor decision remade from scratch because the original reasoning is lost.
Withose gives operations a decision record without adding a process step people will skip. Capture the thread where the decision happened in Slack or Microsoft Teams, let AI draft the record, collect explicit positions from the people who need to sign off, and finalize into a searchable archive that flags when a new decision contradicts an old one.
Same decision, different answers
Two managers handle the same exception opposite ways because the original ruling lives in a thread neither can find. A searchable archive with contradiction checks keeps the rulings consistent.
Sign-off by silence
You posted the new process in the channel, three people thumbs-upped it, and now finance says they never agreed. Withose records explicit support, opposition, or neutrality from each named stakeholder, with their reasoning and confidence.
Audit and compliance questions land on you
"Who approved this vendor and on what basis?" is a one-search answer when the decision record holds the question, the options, the positions, and the date it was finalized.
Process tools your team refuses to use
Ops has seen tools die because they demanded new habits. Withose's habit is one command in the chat tool your company already lives in: /withose in Slack, @Withose in Teams.
A vendor decision, recorded properly
- 1The warehouse-software renewal debate happens where it always does: a Teams channel. You mention @Withose on the thread.
- 2AI drafts the decision record: the question, the two vendors under discussion, and where each participant stands so far.
- 3You add the CFO and the compliance lead as stakeholders. They get email links and record positions without accounts.
- 4The synthesis surfaces the disagreement on contract length as the real open question. You settle it and finalize.
- 5Next quarter, when someone proposes switching vendors again, the record is one search away, and if a conflicting decision gets finalized, Withose flags the contradiction against the archive.
Common questions
Can stakeholders outside our company weigh in?
Yes. Weigh-in links work for anyone with an email address, with no account and no seat cost, which suits external consultants, auditors, and vendor contacts.
What does it cost for a mid-size ops team?
Pricing is public and per seat: a Free plan to start, Team at $45 per seat per month billed annually, Business at $99 with a 3-seat minimum. Seats are pooled at the organization level, and stakeholders never count as seats.
Is captured content secure?
Captured conversation content is encrypted at rest with a per-workspace key, and Withose never has access to your full chat history in the first place; only explicitly captured messages leave your chat platform. Details are on our security page.
Also see Withose for chiefs of staff and product teams, how it works in Slack and in Microsoft Teams, or pricing.
See it work before you sign up for anything.
The playground runs the whole flow on sample data: capture, stakeholder positions, AI synthesis, and a finalized record. No account needed.
Every new workspace starts with a free 7-day Team trial. No card required.